Freebies: when you vote in Delhi’s Election 2025

As the 2025 Delhi Legislative Assembly elections approach, both the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have rolled out various welfare initiatives to attract voters. These initiatives, often labeled as “freebies,” have ignited debates regarding their advantages for the public and their potential economic impact.

AAP’s Welfare Initiatives

Led by Arvind Kejriwal, the AAP has established its political brand by focusing on essential services for the people of Delhi. Their manifesto features:

Mahila Samman Yojana: A program that provides ₹2,100 monthly to women, aimed at boosting their financial independence.

Pujari Granthi Samman Yojana: Financial support of ₹18,000 for temple priests and gurdwara granthis, acknowledging their contributions to the community.

Free Public Services: Continuation of free water and electricity for households within a specified consumption limit, along with free bus rides for women on Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) buses.

BJP’s Welfare Initiatives

The BJP, eager to gain a foothold in Delhi after nearly thirty years, has also introduced several welfare proposals:

Mahila Samriddhi Yojana: A commitment to provide ₹2,500 per month to women from low-income families.

Matru Suraksha Vandana: A program that offers ₹21,000 and six nutrition kits to pregnant women, aimed at enhancing maternal health.

Subsidies and Affordable Meals: Proposals include increased pensions for senior citizens, widows, and vulnerable women, LPG subsidies, and the creation of Atal Canteens that serve meals for ₹5 in slum areas.

Comparative Analysis

Both parties have acknowledged the significance of women’s welfare, presenting monthly financial assistance programs. While AAP proposes ₹2,100, the BJP suggests ₹2,500, with both initiatives focused on economic empowerment. Regarding maternal health, the BJP’s Matru Suraksha Vandana offers a more extensive package compared to AAP’s initiatives.

However, AAP’s emphasis on providing free utilities and transportation addresses the everyday expenses faced by many, potentially benefiting a wider segment of the population.

Impact on the Economy

The rollout of these welfare programs requires significant public spending. While the intention is to uplift marginalized communities, there are worries about the sustainability of such fiscal measures. Increased subsidies could put pressure on the state’s budget, possibly leading to larger deficits. Critics contend that while these populist initiatives may offer short-term benefits, they might not be viable in the long run and could divert funds from crucial infrastructure projects.

The Free Bus Service for Women: A Case Study

AAP’s program to offer free bus rides for women has received both praise and criticism. On one side, it has empowered women by providing safe and affordable transportation, which encourages greater involvement in the workforce and education. Reports show a notable rise in female bus ridership, indicating improved mobility and perceptions of safety.

On the other hand, this initiative has financial repercussions. The Delhi government reimburses the DTC for the revenue lost due to the free rides, which can put a strain on public finances. Additionally, the universal nature of the program means that even women from wealthier backgrounds benefit, raising concerns about the most effective use of resources.

Targeting Freebies to the Needy

A major issue with universal freebies is that they often extend benefits to individuals across all income levels, including those who may not need assistance. For example, free bus services are available to women regardless of their financial situation. To promote fiscal responsibility and ensure that aid reaches those who truly need it, it is crucial to create programs with specific eligibility criteria. Implementing means-testing mechanisms can assist in identifying and supporting economically disadvantaged groups, ensuring that resources are used effectively and reach those who require them the most.

Conclusion

Both AAP and BJP have introduced welfare initiatives to assist the residents of Delhi, but it is essential to strike a balance between populist policies and economic sustainability. By providing targeted assistance, we can ensure that help reaches those in need without placing excessive strain on the state’s finances. As Delhi progresses, it is vital for policymakers to create welfare programs that support marginalized communities while also safeguarding fiscal stability.